Test Valley Water Cycle Study

Open

Buyers

Katy Reed

Value

£40,000

Classifications

Environmental services
Geological and geophysical consultancy services
Agricultural, forestry, horticultural, aquacultural and apicultural services

Tags

tender

Submission Deadline

2 weeks from now

Published

4 hours ago

Description

Test Valley Borough Council is seeking the appointment of an appropriately qualified contractor to prepare a Water Cycle Study (WCS) to support the preparation of the emerging Test Valley Local Plan. This will form part of the evidence base and will inform polices and the infrastructure needed to support the delivery of sustainable future development.

Documents

Premium

Bypass the hassle of outdated portals. Get all the information you need right here, right now.

Contract Agreement

The official contract terms, conditions, and scopes of work.

Download
Award Notice

Details on the tender award and selected suppliers.

Download

Similar Contracts

Open

Provision of Hive Side Training

We are seeking up to three contractors to provide hive side training to intermediate hobbyist beekeepers to teach beekeepers how to recognise pests and diseases and ensure good husbandry practices. The requirement is separated into three lots covering three regions: Lot 1: North of England and Midlands Lot 2: South of England Lot 3 Wales Note on market engagement: market engagement was conducted through a PCR 2015 notice:https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/b26ba9b3-3d8b-43bd-b3d3-21d60541b6f8

Published 4 hours ago

Open

Wyville Thomson Ridge (0924S) Imagery Analysis

The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) is the statutory adviser to the UK Government and devolved administrations on UK and international nature conservation Our role is to provide scientific evidence, information, and advice to inform decisions to protect the natural environment. Our specific role is to work on nature conservation issues that affect the UK as a whole and internationally, by: • advising Government on the development and implementation of policies for, or affecting, nature conservation in the UK and internationally; • providing advice and disseminating knowledge on nature conservation issues affecting the UK and internationally; • establishing common standards throughout the UK for nature conservation, including monitoring, research, and the analysis of results; and • commissioning or supporting research which it deems relevant to these functions. Background to JNCC can be found on JNCC's website at: https://jncc.gov.uk/about-jncc/ 2. Project Aims JNCC wishes to commission a contract to undertake the analysis of seabed imagery (still images and video) collected on the 0924S survey from a drop-frame camera. Seabed imagery will be analysed using the image and video annotation software BIIGLE . During 0924S, imagery data was collected for MPA monitoring purposes. The total number of sampled drop-camera stations was 80; circa 38 hours of high-definition video. Due to technical difficulties, the camera had to be restarted during 4 transects, resulting in multiple videos for these transects, giving a total of 85 videos to be analysed. Videos from one transect should be analysed together. A total of 3,530 still images were collected across 79 of the drop-camera stations. More detailed metadata will be provided including information from logs and the survey report. Throughout the tender process, guest access to the 2024 BIIGLE project will be provided to allow review of the available images. The successful contractor will be provided with access to the 2024 BIIGLE project and the annotated 2018 WTR seabed imagery to aid with identification. Please note that experience in the identification of deep-sea taxa is required to complete this contract. The bid submission should clearly state which of the following options are being bid for, please provide a quote for either option 1, 2 or 3: Option 1 Video analysis, please provide a quote for the cost and breakdown per video hour Option 2 Stills analysis, please provide a quote for the cost and breakdown of the number of stills Option 3 Video analysis and stills analysis, please provide a quote for complete analysis of all imagery (video and stills), breaking down the costs as per options 1 and 2. 3. Project Background JNCC and the Marine Directorate of the Scottish Government (MD) conducted a survey aboard MRV Scotia (0924S) in 2024 to gather evidence to monitor Wyville Thomson Ridge Special Area of Conservation (WTR) (Figure 1) and inform assessment of the extent and condition of the designated features of the site. A survey of WTR was conducted in 2017/18, but the 0924S survey will form the first monitoring point (T0) in the time series at WTR. WTR is located to the northwest of mainland Scotland at the northern end of the Rockall Trough, with the closest land approximately 77 km away at Rona, Scotland. The site has an area of 1,740 km2 and a depth range of 350 m to 1000 m. The designated features of WTR are listed in Table 1. Further information on WTR can be found at the JNCC site information centre https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/wyville-thomson-ridge-mpa/. Table 1. Designated features of Wyville Thomson Ridge SAC. Feature Feature type 1170 Reefs Annex I Habitat Annex I Reef Reefs are formed by biogenic concretions or non-biogenic substrata, which arise from the seafloor and so are topographically distinct from their surroundings (European Commission 2013a). They are generally found in the subtidal zone but may extend in a broken transition into the intertidal zone. Annex I reefs include biogenic reefs, bedrock reefs and stony reefs. The UK has a greater range and extent of rocky reefs than biogenic reefs, and rocky reefs are extremely variable in their structure and in the communities they support (Brown et al. 1997). They range from vertical rock walls to horizontal ledges, sloping or flat bed rock, broken rock, boulder fields, and aggregations of cobbles. A variety of invertebrates can inhabit rocky reefs, including sponges, corals, and sea squirts, which attach to the rock surface. Mobile species, such as fish, lobsters and crustaceans, may also use rocky reefs for shelter. Both types of rocky reefs - bedrock reefs and stony reefs - are protected features within WTR. Bedrock reef Bedrock reef occurs where the bedrock that underlies surface sediments on the seafloor arises from the surrounding seabed, creating a habitat that is colonised by many different marine animals and plants. Bedrock is consolidated rock and can be composed of most rock types (granite, limestone, sandstone etc.). Stony reef Stony reef occurs where 10% or more of the seabed substratum are composed of particles greater than 64 mm across, i.e. cobbles and boulders (European Commission 2013a). The remaining supporting 'matrix' could be of smaller sized material. The reef may be consistent in its coverage or it may form patches with intervening areas of finer sediment. Epifaunal species dominate biological cover. Stony reef should be topographically distinct from the surrounding sea floor with a minimum area of 25 m2 (this also applies to the total area of a patchy reef) (Irving, 2009). Iceberg ploughmarks can be considered as a special type of stony reef. They occur along the UK continental shelf edge off northern and western Scotland, including in WTR (Irving 2009). Iceberg 'ploughmarks' consist of ridges of boulders, cobbles and gravel where finer sediments have been winnowed away by high energy currents at the site, interspersed with finer sediment troughs up to 5 -10 m deep (Masson et al., 2000). They are thought to have been formed by the ploughing movement of icebergs through the seabed at the end of the last ice age. The iceberg ploughmarks in WTR are stable and consolidated and have been classified as stony reef (Irving 2009). Although the Irving (2009) stony reef criteria can be applied in WTR, as iceberg ploughmark Annex I Reef is a special case of Annex I stony reef, regardless of the substrate present, the area identified as iceberg ploughmarks is considered to be Annex I Reef. The patchy nature of stony substrate within the wider iceberg ploughmark area results in a small-scale mosaic of stony and non-stony substrate of the seabed. Hence, small scale variation in the presence or absence of stony reef substratum can occur within the wider Annex I Reef area. Biogenic reef Biogenic reefs are made up of hard matter, formed by animals themselves. The reef structure can be composed of the reef-building organism (including its tubes or shells), or it may also be composed of sediments, stones and shells that the organism has bond together. In the deep sea, the main species that form biogenic reefs include cold-water corals (e.g. Lophelia pertusa, Madrepora oculata and Solenosmilia variabilis). Biogenic reefs can provide complex habitats for species assemblages, such as for sponges, bryozoans, and sea squirts. WTR 2024 Survey (0924S) The 0924S survey departed from Aberdeen on the 23rd of July 2024 and returned to Aberdeen on the 12th of August 2024. Data from this survey will form the first time point (T0) of a monitoring series. The monitoring aims and objectives of survey 0924S relating to seabed imagery are: 1. Collect evidence to inform type one (sentinel) monitoring of the structure and function of Annex I Reef at WTR SAC. 2. Collect evidence to inform the physical extent and distribution of the Annex I Reef within WTR SAC. Imagery was collected with a drop-frame camera (DC) system, towed by the vessel at a target speed of 0.5 knots and a target altitude of 1 m. The following instruments were mounted on the drop-frame camera: • Kongsberg OE 14-408 digital stills camera (10 MP) mounted in a planar (downwards facing) orientation • High definition SubC 1 Alpha video camera in a planar orientation • Four-point (green) laser-scaling with the bottom two set to 67 mm spacing • Additionally: four SEALED lamps, Valeport CTD, Ultra-short Baseline (USBL) acoustic positioning beacon Sampling during the 0924S survey was stratified by zones and depth. Seven zones were selected for the purposes of sampling design, with seven depth contours chosen from within these zones (Figure 2). Video and stills imagery were collected from 80 stations across the seven depth bands. The 300, 400, 450 and 800 m depth bands were prioritised and all stations at these depths, across all zones, were sampled. It was not possible to sample the 500, 600 and 700 m depth bands in all zones during the survey (Figure 3). At each station, the camera tow was continued until a suitable number of images had been collected. As a result, the length of video tows varies. In total, 38 hours and 13 minutes of video and 3,530 still images will be analysed (Table 2). All imagery will be made available via a BIIGLE project. Access to the imagery via the BIIGLE project can be provided on request to aid in the tendering process (see contacts for technical information on page 1) and more detailed metadata will be provided to the successful contractor following contract award.

Published 5 hours ago

Open

Projecting UK Biodiversity Indicators into the future

2. Project Aims The overall aim is to produce a proof-of-concept test on how UK Biodiversity Indicators can be projected into the future to help inform conservation decision-making. The test will include making projections. These are not intended for operational use initially, but will aim to describe the steps, demonstrate potential outputs, and assess the feasibility of more routine application. The scope of the work at present is UK terrestrial biodiversity. 3. Project Background The UK regularly publishes a range of biodiversity indicators (https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-biodiversity-indicators-2024/). These UK Biodiversity Indicators (UKBI) are used to track and report progress against international commitments made through the Global Biodiversity Framework. The indicators are wide-ranging, and encompass pressures (e.g. pollution), policy and management interventions (e.g. sustainable forestry), environmental outcomes (e.g. species population trends), evidence about biodiversity, and public interest and support for conservation. Some of the UKBIs are also used/adapted by individual UK countries, and are an important tool for wider communication of how biodiversity is changing. The analysis of current trends will continue to be essential. However, there is increasing recognition of the need for evidence about how the environment could change in future. There are several aspects to this, including: • Understanding the likely 'Business-as-Usual' future trajectory for pressures and interventions • Understanding impacts from individual policy options and decisions • Investigating the interaction between multiple policies, and the likely net outcomes under different assumptions about implementation • Understanding possible future changes in environmental pressures and the options for management and mitigation This evidence can enable more informed discussions on the balance of policies and how investment is allocated. It can also identify risks and opportunities, and provide a communication tool to raise awareness of possible future environmental trajectories (as used in broadly similar ways e.g. in relation to climate), rather than only focusing on past trends. Furthermore, projecting the UK Biodiversity Indicators gives a direct link with how the UK assesses progress on national and international environmental objectives. Being able to project these indicators and test responses to evolving policy priorities and wider socioeconomic changes would be a powerful tool to inform environmental decision-making. As such, JNCC are particularly interested in flexible and re-usable approaches that combine scenarios of potential environmental changes with models that project what effect these changes have on UKBIs. Related JNCC-supported work This project will contribute to a longer-term JNCC ambition to support the development and implementation of biodiversity projections to inform conservation decision-making, through the Biodiversity Pathways project (https://jncc.gov.uk/news/biodiversity-pathways-project-launched/). The project described in this invitation to tender is a standalone piece and does not rely on any previous work 4. Project Objectives To meet the overall Project Aims (Section 2), the objectives are: 1) Agree at least one suitable scenario for projections. This can be existing or newly produced, but must involve some change in the key drivers that affect selected UK Biodiversity Indicators (i.e. the scenario cannot be 'no change from the current position'). 2) Develop, document, and pilot a re-usable modelling approach to project selected UK Biodiversity Indicators under the scenario(s) for a 20-30 year period. We do not expect this to be suitable for using operationally without further testing, but it should be sufficiently developed to show the potential and to enable Objective 3. 3) Evaluate strengths, limitations, and transferability of the resulting methods and projections, to inform next steps in developing this approach. 5. Project Objectives: Detailed Tasks 1) Agree at least one suitable scenario for projections We do not expect an extensive scenario development process - the main purpose of this contract is to develop and test modelling methods suitable for projecting UK Biodiversity Indicators. As such, the scenario(s) used should identify key direct drivers of changes in the selected indicators and set reasonably plausible values for these. However, scenarios would not need to consider underlying policy or socioeconomic shifts necessary to affect the driver values in this way. Existing scenario(s) can be used if relevant. The UK Biodiversity Indicators used must be suitable for projection for the UK and ideally for individual UK countries. We are particularly interested in the indicators listed below, and would like to include at least one indicator from Group 1 (species trends) and at least one indicator from Group 2 (pressures, habitat condition). Note that several of these indicators include multiple components - ideally, each component would be projected though if this does not add much new information or is impractical with the time/evidence available then the focus can be narrowed. Where bidders are aware of overlap with previous or ongoing work on biodiversity projections, this relationship should be explained with a description of how proposals build on rather than duplicate other work. GROUP 1: UK Biodiversity Indicators relating to species trends. Priority to include projections for at least one indicator from the following list Status of threatened species Conservation status of UK species of European importance Priority species abundance Trends in the relative abundance of priority species Priority species distribution Trends in distribution of UK priority species Birds of the wider countryside and at sea Trends in abundance of commoner native birds Insects of the wider countryside (butterflies) Trends in abundance of resident butterfly species Plants of the wider countryside Change in abundance of plant species in four UK broad habitat types Mammals of the wider countryside (bats) Changes in relative abundance of GB breeding bat species Status of pollinating insects Changes in the distribution of bees and hoverflies GROUP 2: UK Biodiversity Indicators of pressures and habitat condition. Priority to include projections for at least one indicator from the following list Air pollution Area affected by acidification and area affected by excess nitrogen Invasive species Number of invasive non-native species established Changes in the extent of invasive non-native species Protected areas Changes in the extent and condition of Protected Areas Status of threatened habitats Conservation status of UK habitats of European importance 2) Develop, document, and pilot a re-usable modelling approach to project indicators under the chosen scenario(s), for a 20-30 year period There is no requirement to use a specific modelling approach. However, the methods (including code) must be clearly and transparently described in sufficient detail to enable re-use and external evaluation. Consideration should also be given to how the approach could be generalised to other indicators (see Task 3, below). The choice of method should be justified as suitable for projecting indicators for a 20-30 year period, and ideally for individual UK countries. Projections should be accompanied by an explanation of the approach to validating outputs, and descriptions of assumptions and uncertainties. We recognise that projections can be complex to produce, and we do not expect the methods to be suitable for using operationally without further testing. However, the content should be sufficiently developed to show the potential and to enable Objective 3. 3) Evaluate strengths, limitations, and transferability of the resulting methods and projections, to inform next steps in developing this approach Objective evaluation of strengths and limitations of the projections is essential to inform future work. The detail of this will depend on the outcomes, but is likely to include: i) Would the methods be feasible to apply operationally, e.g. on a regular basis and/or with new scenarios or policy questions? If yes, what is required to achieve that? ii) Could the methods be extended to other UK Biodiversity Indicators? If yes, which indicators and what would be required to achieve that? iii) What additional evidence would help improve the projections and/or enable better validation of outputs? iv) Are there additional indicators not currently within (or in-development for) the UKBI that would be informative for conservation and amenable to scenarios and modelling? Outputs should be written into a report (see Section 7, below). See Section 13 for guidance on tender responses 7. Outputs Any products or outputs submitted to JNCC [for publication] should adhere to JNCC's house-style and should be produced in an accessible format (see Product Specification below for more information). The expected output is a report including indicator projections, methods detail, and commentary on findings, with a limit of approximately 7,000 words. A shorter non-technical summary will also be required (approx. 250-500 words). Additional information (e.g. code) should be included as supplementary material as needed. Responses can propose additional or alternative outputs and formats if these would more effectively meet the project objectives. 8. Product Specification JNCC is committed to making its publicly available resources and documents accessible, in accordance with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018.

Published 4 days ago

AI Bid Assistant

Our AI-powered tool to help you create winning bids is coming soon!

View Contract Source Save Contract

Organisation

Katy Reed

Public authority - sub-central government

Dave Owers

[email protected]

+44 01264368000

Timeline active

Publish

Bid

Evaluate

Award

Complete