PRO004736-Works-Framework-Build Only

Award

Value

£0

Classifications

  • Construction work
  • Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
  • Building construction work
  • Engineering works and construction works
  • Construction work for tunnels, shafts and subways
  • Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines
  • Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
  • Construction work for water projects
  • Construction work for dams, canals, irrigation channels and aqueducts
  • Construction works for sewage treatment plants, purification plants and refuse incineration plants
  • Water-treatment plant construction work
  • Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services
  • Supervision of project and documentation
  • Engineering services
  • Construction project management services
  • Natural resources management or conservation strategy planning services
  • Consultative engineering and construction services

Tags

  • award
  • contract

Published

10 months ago

Description

United Utilities has concluded the process of awarding framework agreements for it's Build Only delivery runway. These frameworks form part of the design and build delivery runway within our AMP8 operating model.
Framework agreements have been awarded for construction of assets in two Lots:
Lot 1 - Non-Infrastructure
Lot 2 - Infrastructure

Documents

Premium

Bypass the hassle of outdated portals. Get all the information you need right here, right now.

  • Contract Agreement

    The official contract terms, conditions, and scopes of work.

    Download
  • Award Notice

    Details on the tender award and selected suppliers.

    Download

Similar Contracts

Open

Elmstead New Community Centre

1. Description: Following an extensive process over more than a decade, Elmstead Parish Council is now in a position to seek a construction contract with a reputable and experienced firm to build a new community centre. Setting: Elmstead is a rural village a few miles east of Colchester, Essex, in the district of Tendring. With the village having doubled in size over the last decade, the current community centre has served the parish well, with the main building being over a century old, but limitations caused by increasing maintenance and a constrained site with minimal parking means a new, modern community centre is very much needed. Conveniently an agreement was reached with a housing developer to secure more than sufficient property just across the road from the old community centre to build a new facility with surrounding land that can be utilized for other community uses. Intro: Despite delays during the pandemic causing an initial planning application to expire, the Parish Council is now in a position where it owns the site with direct highway access being in a position to begin immediately once a contract is agreed. The Parish Council is in an excellent position to minimize risk and ensure minimal problems during the construction process and would welcome a construction partner to take full advantage of this exciting opportunity for the community. Planning Permission: Alongside our architect the Parish Council has obtained planning permission from Tendring District Council for a single-story building with around 700 sqm floor space, adjacent 54 space car park and surrounding landscaping. [24/01281/FUL] The building will be a single storey brick and block construction with prefabricated timber roof trusses supporting an artificial slate roof. Comprehensive plans are included in the attached design documents. With our architect acting as lead designer alongside a team of structural and mechanical engineers the building regulation application has been submitted, we are in an advanced stage of design while we hope to have left sufficient flexibility to best work with the successful tenderer to create the best community centre possible. While we have completed much of RIBA stage 4, we have waited to finalise some elements of the technical design to work with our chosen builder on the best solutions, with the construction contract to focus on RIBA stages 5 - 6. To ensure we meet the requirements of public works contracts for a council of our size, we have employed a quantity surveyor to produce bills of quantities which the tender applicants are to use to form a detailed costing breakdown. As a Parish Council we are obligated to minimize risk when making decisions so examples of previous experience constructing comparable public buildings such as other community centres, council buildings, healthcare facilities, schools and libraries is required. To ensure the best use of public money spent on the project we expect to work with our architect, quantity surveyor and builder to best value engineer the project in the lead up to construction. The new community centre project has adopted an ethos of accessibility, functionality, future proofing and best serving the diverse needs of the local community, and we would encourage tender applicants to consider the same principles in their submission. With a degree of flexibility in additional sources of funding we estimate the construction cost to be around £1,600,000 but are optimistic the final cost could be under this budget to allow additional spending on the outdoor facilities around the new community centre. With the tender duration ending in late November, we hope to have decided a successful tender applicant by Christmas and finalise contracts at the start of the new year with the intention to start building in spring with a construction timeframe of around a year. Enquiries concerning the tender: Due to tender regulations, all communication regarding the tender must be addressed solely to Angela Baxter (Parish Clerk) via email at [email protected]. Communications regarding the tender must not take place with any councillor. The site of the new community centre is publicly accessible, so in the interests of fairness we are not arranging site viewings but would encourage applicants to visit the site independently if they wish. 2. Tender Submission: Your tender should include the following information as a minimum however we would encourage more detailed proposals. • Fully priced bills of quantities. • Proposed construction programme. • Confirmation and details of insurance and liability cover provided. • Confirmation and details of availability to commence construction in 2026. • Confirmation and details of relevant experience of community buildings. 3. Procurement Timetable (c. to f. may need to be amended by the Parish Council) a. Tender Notice Issued: 17th October 2025 b. Tender Return: 20th November 2025 5.00pm c. Tender Evaluation and Questions: Late November 2025 d. Tender Confirmation: Between 4th - 18th December 2025 e. Contract Start date: February 2026 f. Contract End date: On completion of RIBA stage 6 (expectation of contract completion early 2027) 4. Inconclusive Outcomes The Parish Council withholds the right to not accept any of the submitted tender responses. 5. Financial Standing & Resources The Parish Council wishes to ensure that suppliers have the necessary financial standing and resources to meet their obligations throughout the duration of this contract. The Parish Council may undertake a credit check on all organisations who submit a tender. 6. Freedom of Information Act The Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to all the activities of Elmstead Parish Council. As a Tenderer providing services to the Parish Council, you should be aware of the Parish Council's obligations and its responsibilities under the Act to provide on request access to recorded information held by it. One of the consequences of these statutory responsibilities is that information which the Parish Council holds about your organisation may be subject to disclosure, in response to a request, unless the Parish Council decides that one of the various statutory exemptions applies. 7. Disclaimer All information contained in this document together with any subsequent statements howsoever conveyed, in respect of this Tender process, is provided in good faith and given to assist you. However, the Parish Council will not accept any liability in respect of the preparation or execution of your proposals, or any penalties / costs that you may incur thereof. 8. Modifications to Tender Any modifications to the tender notice will be published at least 5 working days before the Tender End Date and shall be issued as an addendum to, and shall be deemed to constitute part of the invitation to Tender. If necessary, the Council shall revise the Tender Date in order to enable this requirement. Except under exceptional circumstances no extension of time and date by which the Tender must be submitted will be granted. Total Value £1,600,000 (estimated exclusive of VAT) Regulated below threshold Contract dates (estimated) 16th February 2026 to 19th February 2027 1 year Main procurement category Works Participation Legal and financial capacity conditions of participation General Conditions a. Costs: Elmstead Parish Council will not be responsible for any costs or expenses incurred by the Tenderer in connection with either the preparation or delivery or in the evaluation of the Tender. b. Validity of Tender: All details of the Tender, including prices are to remain valid for acceptance for 90 days from the Tender Return date. c. Treatment of Tender: Elmstead Parish Council does not undertake to accept the lowest tender, or part, or all of any Tender, and the acknowledgement of receipt of any submitted Tender shall not constitute any actual or implied agreement between the Parish Council and the Tenderer. The Parish Council reserves the right to accept any part or all of any Tender or Tenders at its sole discretion. d. Data Protection, Security, Ownership & Use of Data: All Parish Council data must remain in the control of the Parish Council and the services supplied must comply with the Data Protection Act (2018) and maintain confidentiality and security of data. Any reports, notes of meetings, outputs, data, information and research finding will be the property of the Parish Council, all the rights pertaining thereto. Potential Suppliers must confirm in writing that they accept this ownership as part of their Tender submission. e. Combined Liability Insurance: It is a requirement of this Contract that the appointed Tenderer should be insured against Professional Indemnity Insurance - with a minimum Limit of Indemnity of £2,500,000. Particular suitability Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) ________________________________________ Submission Enquiry deadline 13th November 2025, 5:00 pm Tender submission deadline 20th November 2025, 5:00pm Submission address and any special instructions Parish Council website: https://www.elmsteadparishcouncil.gov.uk/ Email to send tenders to is: [email protected] Tenders may be submitted electronically Yes Languages that may be used for submission English Award decision date (estimated) 11 December 2025

Katy Reed

Published 13 hours ago
Open

Towards development of a UK peatland indicator framework

1. Joint Nature Conservation Committee The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) is the statutory adviser to the UK Government and devolved administrations on UK and international nature conservation Our role is to provide scientific evidence, information, and advice to inform decisions to protect the natural environment. Our specific role is to work on nature conservation issues that affect the UK as a whole and internationally, by: • advising Government on the development and implementation of policies for, or affecting, nature conservation in the UK and internationally; • providing advice and disseminating knowledge on nature conservation issues affecting the UK and internationally; • establishing common standards throughout the UK for nature conservation, including monitoring, research, and the analysis of results; and • commissioning or supporting research which it deems relevant to these functions. Background to JNCC can be found on JNCC's website at: https://jncc.gov.uk/about-jncc/ 2. Project Aims To develop conceptual models describing the variables affecting wildfire risk, flood risk, water quality and/or water provisioning in and downstream from peatland. 3. Project Background When in good condition, peatlands are important for delivering a wide range of benefits to society, such as carbon storage and reduced emissions, wildfire regulation, flood regulation, water quality regulation, and water provision - as well as many cultural and supporting services, such as preservation of archaeology, outdoor recreation, and habitat provision. Whilst a national indicator of peatland carbon balance already exists, within the UK Greenhouse Gas Inventory, similar national scale data are not currently available for the other benefits that peatlands provide. In order to ultimately reach the stage of developing additional indicators focused on societal outcomes, the first step is to gain a thorough understanding from the literature of the known variables affecting that benefit and develop a conceptual model - as specified within this invitation to tender. The eventual existence of such indicators would allow for: • more effective business cases to be made by those seeking funding for peatland conservation and restoration activities • more informed decisions to be made by funders, and stronger justification for decisions they make around public spending • a clear and relatable way to communicate the importance of peat to non-specialists, such as ministers and the general public • tracking of progress through time, for example against each of the four UK countries' Peatland Strategies • policymakers to design more effective policies through an improved understanding of the pressures and drivers that are affecting the indicator results • depending on the format of the final model, potentially spatial prioritisation, prediction of the output of any given policy, and an understanding of any trade-offs and potential for perverse incentives from a given policy. Stakeholder engagement across the four UK countries has identified a need for a UK peatland indicator framework, and several potential indicators were selected as priorities - four of which (wildfire risk, flood risk, water quality, and water provisioning) JNCC wish to let an initial research phase on. JNCC have already undertaken a short scoping exercise on the feasibility of a range of potential peatland indicators, the outputs of which will be shared with the successful contractor as a starting point. For the purposes of this project, we use the term 'indicator' in its broadest sense; anything that gives an indicative metric of change through time, whether that is measured or modelled, and whether that is related to a driver, a pressure, a state, an impact or a response; with modelled impact indicators being the specific direction within this that we wish to take forward. We are however focusing on indicators relevant to a national scale - whether producing a national total or a national map - rather than indicators that are designed to be used in an individual project on a very small scale, for example to determine whether restoration actions of an individual project have been successful. 4. Project Objectives To meet the overall aims of this project (Section 2), the objectives are: 1. To undertake an evidence review identifying the factors affecting peatland's delivery of the following societal outcomes. We welcome bids to develop a minimum of one and a maximum of all four outcomes, depending on the expertise of the bidder. Please note JNCC reserves the right to accept all or part of your bid: o Wildfire risk o Flood risk o Water quality o Water provision • To develop a conceptual model (a graphical representation of a system, identifying components of the system and the relationships between them) based on the literature review findings 2. To undertake a data review, identifying which of the factors within the conceptual model have data available that could feed in, if progressing the work to develop a modelled indicator at a later stage 5. Project Objectives: Detailed Tasks 1. Evidence review • Each review should answer one of the following key questions: o Which variables (pressures, management actions, condition metrics, geographic or climatic features, etc) affect wildfire risk in peatland environments? What is their relationship (e.g. positive/negative, strong/weak, linear/complex) with wildfire risk in peatland environments? o Which peatland variables (pressures, management actions, condition metrics, geographic or climatic features, etc) affect downstream flood risk? What is their relationship (e.g. positive/negative, strong/weak, linear/complex) with downstream flood risk? o Which peatland variables (pressures, management actions, condition metrics, geographic or climatic features, etc) affect downstream water quality? What is their relationship (e.g. positive/negative, strong/weak, linear/complex) with downstream water quality? Water quality includes the presence of discolouration, the presence of a range of specific chemical pollutants (e.g. nitrates and sulphates) and/or water treatment costs to remove those of relevance to human health. o Which peatland variables (pressures, management actions, condition metrics, geographic or climatic features, etc) affect water provisioning capabilities? What is their relationship (e.g. positive/negative, strong/weak, linear/complex) with water provision capabilities? • The search strategy and information to be recorded from each paper should be proposed to JNCC at the start-up meeting, for input and agreement, before work commences • Where possible, the review methodology should align with the 'quick scoping review' guidance provided at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-production-of-quick-scoping-reviews-and-rapid-evidence-assessments • Where any quantitative evidence about relationships between variables, interactions between variables, and the relative weighting of variables are found, this information should be recorded (e.g. the benefit increases linearly with variable x; or variable a only effects the benefit when variable b is in a particular state) • The list of papers screened, included/excluded, and raw notes from each paper reviewed should be shared as an output • In addition, findings should be written up into a short summary that could be included within a technical report at a later date, if an indicator based on this information is subsequently developed • Where evidence gaps are noted (e.g. 'it was not possible to conclude on x from the studies available'), these should be noted within the summary • Recent JNCC work assessing the impacts of peatland restoration actions on ecosystem service delivery will be shared with the successful contractor for them to build on . If undertaking the wildfire review, the contractor may also wish to build on this previous JNCC project predicting wildfire risk in the Brecon Beacons: https://hub.jncc.gov.uk/assets/7691fb4a-b77a-4f8e-8660-a06b567ba345 1. Conceptual model • By conceptual model, we mean a flowchart depicting key factors of relevance to the societal benefit in question, including peatland-relevant pressures, management actions, condition metrics, geographic or climatic features, and intermediate steps in the system • An example of a conceptual model that has been developed for a separate JNCC project on mineral soils is included here for reference: • This task will synthesise the findings from the literature review into a similar diagram • The aim is not for an entirely complete systems map, but to identify the variables likely to be most significant. The successful contractor will involve the JNCC steering group in the decision-making process behind inclusion/exclusion of each variable • The purpose of this is to act as a framework for potential subsequent quantitative model development in future financial years 2. Data review • This task will search for data sources that could be used for each variable within the conceptual model • Ideally, these will be open access data sources. Where open access data are not available, licensed datasets can be noted alongside their relevant licensing information • Ideally, these will be spatial data, with the geographic resolution noted. Where spatial data are not available, non-spatial data can be noted • Ideally, these will be UK in scale. Where only smaller geographic scales are available, these can be included instead, with the area that they do cover noted • Where no data can be found in relation to a particular variable, this can be noted • The task will also search for data on previous wildfires, floods, water quality and availability of water for provision in a subset of relevant locations, for potential use to train an empirical model in future that captures the variables identified within the literature review.

Katy Reed

Published 14 hours ago

AI Bid Assistant

Our AI-powered tool to help you create winning bids is coming soon!

View Contract Source Save Contract

Timeline complete

Publish
Bid
Evaluate
Award
Complete