RDE613 Audit of hydrodynamic nutrient models for estuaries under OFWAT PR24

Award

Value

£62,730

Classifications

  • Research and development consultancy services

Tags

  • award

Submission Deadline

1 year ago

Published

1 year ago

Description

Under the water industry national environment programme (WINEP) 2024 price review (PR24), water companies are required to carry out investigations in estuarine and coastal protected areas (Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Marine Conservation Zones (MCZs) and Ramsar sites), where there is evidence that conditions are unfavourable for nutrients and water company assets may be significant contributors to nutrient loading. As part of these investigations, 3D hydrodynamic models will be built to model dispersion of contaminants (in particular nutrients) from Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTWs) and other sources and will predict concentrations of contaminants in space and time from point discharges. These investigations have been put forward by Natural England (NE) under Habitats Directive and SSSI drivers.
NE have requested 11 models in estuaries and costal protected areas which are considered unfavourable for nutrients. This is alongside six sites put forward by the Environment Agency (EA) to model chemicals. This contract will be focused on nutrient investigations led by NE, although in some instances models will jointly include chemicals and nutrient investigation so some elements may be combined.
Once produced, the models will aid in improving NE/EA's understanding of the concentration of contaminants in receiving waters and protected areas, to enhance our capability to assess the potential risks and impacts on protected features. These models will be essential to inform decision making when establishing appropriate permit limits for the WwTW needed to restore each estuarine and coastal protected areas to favourable nutrient conditions.
Reporting on progress will be required through a seven step phased process:
Phase 1: Review of behaviour of pollutants of concern in UK estuaries, including sediment 
attachment/detachment. (Complete Sept 2023)
Phase 2: Review of existing models. 
Phase 3: Data review and gap analysis. 
Phase 4: Data collection.
Phase 5: Model development and calibration 
Phase 6: Model validation
Phase 7: Scenario testing, with a view to determining permit limits
Models will be produced in line with the model scope produced jointly by the EA and NE, which sets out the specification of requirements for models to be delivered (see Appendix A).

Documents

Premium

Bypass the hassle of outdated portals. Get all the information you need right here, right now.

  • Contract Agreement

    The official contract terms, conditions, and scopes of work.

    Download
  • Award Notice

    Details on the tender award and selected suppliers.

    Download

Similar Contracts

Open

Capturing transitional changes in GHG fluxes following peat restoration

There is approximately 1,420,000 hectares of peat in England, with deep peat accounting for approximately 680,000 hectares. However, the majority of our deep peat is degraded, damaged and dried out, with only 13% of deep peat remaining in a near natural state. As a result, peatlands in England emit approximately 8 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year, about 2% of England's total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. There is an urgent need to re-wet peatlands to abate these GHG emissions to meet our net zero targets. In Carbon Budget 7, the Climate Change Committee recommends that by 2040, peatland restoration should represent over 50% of the emissions savings in land use, and 17% of the savings in the agriculture and land use sector. Peatland restoration targets have been set in the 2023 Environmental Improvement Plan (EIP), with an aim to restore 280,000 hectares by 2050. When peat is restored or re-wet, it moves from a degraded condition category to a restored or re-wet condition category in the UK National GHG Inventory using an IPCC Tier 2 methodology. This move is treated as a step-change without considering any transition between the two steady states. However, it has been hypothesised that this methodology is failing to consider a significant transitional removal of CO2 when a heavily degraded peat is restored. Thus, the CO2 sequestration potential of peat restoration may have been significantly underestimated. To date, the abatement potential of peat restoration has focused only on avoided emissions, however, the potential transitional removal of CO2 could make peat restoration a significant net greenhouse gas removal (GGR), which would be a game changer for attracting carbon finance. The report by Evans et al (2022) on ‘Aligning the Peatland Code with the UK Peatland Inventory’, proposes a model for capturing transitional changes in GHG fluxes post-restoration for CO2. However, this model needs to be refined and validated before it can be used to support investment in peat restoration or to understand the transitional removal of CO2 and its contribution to emissions savings. Therefore, research is required to refine and validate the model approach and to establish the criteria and method for how transitional CO2 uptake could be applied within the National GHG inventory and the Peatland Code.

Katy Reed

Published 16 hours ago

AI Bid Assistant

Our AI-powered tool to help you create winning bids is coming soon!

View Contract Source Save Contract

Timeline complete

Publish
Bid
Evaluate
Award
Complete