RDE 318 - Follow on study to Dual Purpose Cows - GHG Mitigation Rationale

Award

Buyers

Value

£0

Classifications

  • Research and development consultancy services

Tags

  • award

Submission Deadline

1 year ago

Published

1 year ago

Description

At present we source about 50% of our Beef from dairy beef cross animals, and 50% from specialist 
suckler beef breeds. Precise statistics are not available, but information can be inferred from the 
Cattle Tracing System data. The Emissions Intensity of suckler beef is on average 70% higher than
that of beef from the dairy herd due to longer maturation times and lower energy diets. Suckler Beef
also requires around 2 to 6 times the land to produce than dairy beef, depending on the intensity of
the finishing system. Efforts to increase the proportion of beef supplied from the dairy sector could
therefore provide significant GHG reductions and alleviate land constraints for habitat creation, or
greenhouse gas removal technologies such as afforestation.
Two scenarios present themselves:
1. Replacing specialist dairy breeds such as Holstein with a dual-purpose breed like Norwegian 
Red that produce less milk and more beef. Although emissions from milk production would go 
up slightly, this would be more than offset by the reduced overheads of maintaining two herds
2. Improving the quality of dairy/beef cross animals through improved beef sire quality could 
improve beef yields e.g., switching from Angus/Hereford to Charolais, or potentially double 
muscled varieties such as Belgian Blue. 

This project was awarded by Defra.

Documents

Premium

Bypass the hassle of outdated portals. Get all the information you need right here, right now.

  • Contract Agreement

    The official contract terms, conditions, and scopes of work.

    Download
  • Award Notice

    Details on the tender award and selected suppliers.

    Download

Similar Contracts

Open

Capturing transitional changes in GHG fluxes following peat restoration

There is approximately 1,420,000 hectares of peat in England, with deep peat accounting for approximately 680,000 hectares. However, the majority of our deep peat is degraded, damaged and dried out, with only 13% of deep peat remaining in a near natural state. As a result, peatlands in England emit approximately 8 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year, about 2% of England's total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. There is an urgent need to re-wet peatlands to abate these GHG emissions to meet our net zero targets. In Carbon Budget 7, the Climate Change Committee recommends that by 2040, peatland restoration should represent over 50% of the emissions savings in land use, and 17% of the savings in the agriculture and land use sector. Peatland restoration targets have been set in the 2023 Environmental Improvement Plan (EIP), with an aim to restore 280,000 hectares by 2050. When peat is restored or re-wet, it moves from a degraded condition category to a restored or re-wet condition category in the UK National GHG Inventory using an IPCC Tier 2 methodology. This move is treated as a step-change without considering any transition between the two steady states. However, it has been hypothesised that this methodology is failing to consider a significant transitional removal of CO2 when a heavily degraded peat is restored. Thus, the CO2 sequestration potential of peat restoration may have been significantly underestimated. To date, the abatement potential of peat restoration has focused only on avoided emissions, however, the potential transitional removal of CO2 could make peat restoration a significant net greenhouse gas removal (GGR), which would be a game changer for attracting carbon finance. The report by Evans et al (2022) on ‘Aligning the Peatland Code with the UK Peatland Inventory’, proposes a model for capturing transitional changes in GHG fluxes post-restoration for CO2. However, this model needs to be refined and validated before it can be used to support investment in peat restoration or to understand the transitional removal of CO2 and its contribution to emissions savings. Therefore, research is required to refine and validate the model approach and to establish the criteria and method for how transitional CO2 uptake could be applied within the National GHG inventory and the Peatland Code.

Katy Reed

Published 10 hours ago

AI Bid Assistant

Our AI-powered tool to help you create winning bids is coming soon!

View Contract Source Save Contract

Timeline complete

Publish
Bid
Evaluate
Award
Complete