Advice on evaluating and regulating rail strategic planning

Award

Value

£40,000

Classifications

  • Business and management consultancy and related services

Tags

  • award

Submission Deadline

1 year ago

Published

1 year ago

Description

ORR is seeking advice on its approach to understanding and regulating the Infrastructure Manager's (IM) delivery of strategic planning.   

ORR has previously more directly involved with strategic planning, but during CP6 our engagement with NR's System Operator has focused more strongly on other issues such as timetabling. We consider that strategic planning is likely to need a stronger regulatory focus during CP7 and would therefore like to consider our capabilities and approach.  

We are seeking advice and recommendations on the following:
•	What characteristics and qualities the IM's strategic planning processes will need to support the public interest and private sector use of the network (freight and open access).
•	Evaluative commentary on Network Rail's previous approaches to strategic planning, including: 
o	An assessment of what characteristics/qualities worked particularly well, or conversely were problematic 
o	What fostered good engagement and confidence in the outcomes
o	Whether there are lessons to be drawn from previous approaches.
•	What types of behaviours need to be encouraged through our regulatory approach, both within IM and by stakeholders; and how these behaviours can be a) assessed and b) supported/incentivised.
•	How the strategic planning function of NR and/or GBR can be held to account through Control Period 7.  This should include consideration of: 
o	How and when in strategic planning process ORR can most effectively evaluate (and if necessary, intervene in) strategic planning to ensure that it delivers government priorities and stakeholder requirements.
o	What elements of the strategic planning process ORR could most effectively seek to evaluate (for example, consideration of "input" issues such as stakeholder engagement; process and capability issues; and output quality.)
o	Whether there are lessons to be drawn for ORR's approach to holding to account on strategic planning, potentially drawing on previous approaches or the approach taken by other regulators.
•	Updating ORR's guidelines on strategic planning.  Our current guidance is available here: Long term planning process | Office of Rail and Road (orr.gov.uk) 
•	What capabilities ORR may need to develop or source to support our future capability in holding the IM to account.

Advice and recommendations should be robust to the particular circumstances of GBR as an integrated rail body (responsible for both infrastructure and large proportion of train service specification) and the current position of NR as IM but not franchise authority. It will be critical that all funders, specifiers, all types of train operator and freight operators have confidence in the strategic planning process whatever wider industry structure is in place. 

We are not seeking advice on what GBR's strategic planning process should be, or how it is resourced or delivered.  This is a matter for GBR.

Additional information: As detailed in the ITT, the project team will be holding a session on Thursday 24 November at 10:00am with potential bidders to set expectations and take any questions. If you are unable to attend, the session will be recorded and any questions and answers and anything mentioned in the session will be posted on Bravo for all suppliers to view. You may also still raise any clarification questions on Bravo.

If you wish to attend, please contact [email protected] and the PM will issue out a Teams invite.

The tender exercise is being managed via the ORR Procurement portal (BRAVO). All tender clarification questions must be raised via the portal.

Documents

Premium

Bypass the hassle of outdated portals. Get all the information you need right here, right now.

  • Contract Agreement

    The official contract terms, conditions, and scopes of work.

    Download
  • Award Notice

    Details on the tender award and selected suppliers.

    Download

Similar Contracts

Open

Review of Certain Regulatory Policies For Online Audiovisual Services

Some major English-speaking territories (e.g., Australia, Canada, New Zealand) and many European countries (e.g. Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain) have brought in, are introducing or are considering regulation of online audiovisual services, mainly Video on Demand (VOD) but sometimes also Video Sharing Platforms (VSPs), with the aim to support their national screen industries, especially independent sectors. The measures include investment obligations, levies, rules around rights retention as well as quotas. Within the European Union and the European Economic Area, such interventions are governed by the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). Ahead of the ex-post evaluation of the AVMSD due from the European Commission by December 2026, there is already debate around the current set of interventions that are allowed by the AVMSD and some EU stakeholders will be pushing for revisions to the AVMSD interventions (these might include, e.g. investment obligations, levies, quotas and rights retention as well as whether these parts of the Directive should be extended to VSPs). There are some research reports providing either an overarching view of policy options and drivers in this sphere (such as Film i Väst reports) or a limited release of early data (as in the case of the Centre National du Cinéma et de l'image Animée (CNC)), but there is no comprehensive analysis of either the rationale for these measures or their initial impacts on the health of the wider screen ecosystem in the respective territories. The principal focus of this research is the impact of regulation of online services, including VOD (both Subscription Video on Demand (SVOD) and Ad-supported Video on Demand (AVOD) platforms), and video sharing platforms such as YouTube and TikTok where relevant. For each country studied, we want to understand the impacts on the audiovisual ecosystem as a whole, and local independent film and TV production in particular (as strengthening the latter is often the objective of such interventions), audiences and cultural diversity. The study should also include a counterfactual which considers these impacts in a territory (outside the UK) in which such measures have not been introduced. Additional information: To take part in this tender, please visit our website, at https://in-tendhost.co.uk/bfi/aspx/Tenders/Current , where you will need to register, if you haven't already, and express an interest in this opportunity to access the relevant documents. Please note expressions of interest will only be accepted via the portal. Is a Recurrent Procurement Type? : No

BFI

Published 2 days ago
Open

Review of Certain Regulatory Policies For Online Audiovisual Services

Some major English-speaking territories (e.g., Australia, Canada, New Zealand) and many European countries (e.g. Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain) have brought in, are introducing or are considering regulation of online audiovisual services, mainly Video on Demand (VOD) but sometimes also Video Sharing Platforms (VSPs), with the aim to support their national screen industries, especially independent sectors. The measures include investment obligations, levies, rules around rights retention as well as quotas. Within the European Union and the European Economic Area, such interventions are governed by the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). Ahead of the ex-post evaluation of the AVMSD due from the European Commission by December 2026, there is already debate around the current set of interventions that are allowed by the AVMSD and some EU stakeholders will be pushing for revisions to the AVMSD interventions (these might include, e.g. investment obligations, levies, quotas and rights retention as well as whether these parts of the Directive should be extended to VSPs). There are some research reports providing either an overarching view of policy options and drivers in this sphere (such as Film i Väst reports) or a limited release of early data (as in the case of the Centre National du Cinéma et de l'image Animée (CNC)), but there is no comprehensive analysis of either the rationale for these measures or their initial impacts on the health of the wider screen ecosystem in the respective territories. The principal focus of this research is the impact of regulation of online services, including VOD (both Subscription Video on Demand (SVOD) and Ad-supported Video on Demand (AVOD) platforms), and video sharing platforms such as YouTube and TikTok where relevant. For each country studied, we want to understand the impacts on the audiovisual ecosystem as a whole, and local independent film and TV production in particular (as strengthening the latter is often the objective of such interventions), audiences and cultural diversity. The study should also include a counterfactual which considers these impacts in a territory (outside the UK) in which such measures have not been introduced. Additional information: To take part in this tender, please visit our website, at https://in-tendhost.co.uk/bfi/aspx/Tenders/Current , where you will need to register, if you haven't already, and express an interest in this opportunity to access the relevant documents. Please note expressions of interest will only be accepted via the portal. Is a Recurrent Procurement Type? : No

BFI

Published 2 days ago

AI Bid Assistant

Our AI-powered tool to help you create winning bids is coming soon!

View Contract Source Save Contract

Timeline complete

Publish
Bid
Evaluate
Award
Complete