Consultancy Services Framework (including economic and financial analysis, research and modelling)

Award

Description

Tees Valley Combined Authority Group wishes to establish an economic consultancy services framework to provide the following types of specialist support, focused around Tees Valley economic policy priorities and key sectors:
• Business Case Development and Appraisal
• Evaluation and Impact Assessment
• Econometric modelling Intelligence Analysis and Forecasting
• Bespoke policy analysis, relating to economic policy theme and/or sectors
• Strategy and Policy Development
• Investment Appraisal and Due Diligence

Similar Contracts

Open

Literature review on the balance between publicly-listed and privately-held companies

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) regulates auditors, accountants and actuaries and sets the UK's Corporate Governance and Stewardship Codes. As the Competent Authority for audit in the UK, we set auditing and ethical standards and monitor and enforce audit quality. The purpose of the FRC is to serve the public interest and support UK economic growth by upholding high standards of corporate governance, corporate reporting, audit and actuarial work. The FRC is seeking a Literature review on the balance between publicly-listed and privately-held companies The number of UK publicly-listed companies (PLCs) has fallen over the past decade. At the same time more companies are choosing to remain unlisted and financing their growth through private capital . The UK has become Europe's largest private-equity hub, and its leading venture capital market , both of which are funding privately held (non-listed) companies (PHCs). As part of its ongoing market monitoring activities, the FRC is seeking research services to deliver a review of the leading expert literature to understand the scale, trajectory and international context of these changes. As well as potential implications which might arise. This will include peer-reviewed academic research, as well as studies carried out with suitable rigour by professional bodies, industry organisations, and think tanks (grey literature). The review should draw on literature from a range of relevant disciplines including, but not limited to: law, economics, political economy, business, public administration. It should be written to inform non-academic readers about the following: • The leading analyses of evidence on theses changes, including: o The scale, trajectory, and other relevant characteristics. o Views on what might happen next. o The international context from relevant jurisdiction(s). o The causes/drivers of the change and whether they are evolving over time, including evidence on how and why commercial entities choose between different potential sources of funding. • Whether the literature provides any information relevant to understanding any potential impact on: o Our regulation, in particular the effect of shifts in sources of capital when combined with the existing policy landscape and legislative definitions which drive audit and corporate reporting requirements. o Any additional, relevant policy implications for us to consider. The review should be focused on the UK but may also draw on literature that brings insights from other jurisdictions, where clearly relevant. The markets in-scope for this research will include: • London Stock Exchange (LSE) Main Market • LSE Alternative Investment Market (AIM) • Relevant markets of the Aquis exchange • UK private-equity, venture capital, and private-credit markets We may also include other UK debt and equity markets. This will be discussed with the successful research contractor once appointed. Suggested approach Methodology • Search strategy: databases (e.g. JSTOR, SSRN, Web of Science, Scopus), policy portals, news archives. • Literature: o Inclusion/exclusion criteria should include, but not be limited to: relevance to UK context, credibility/quality/reliability, publication date, citations (or equivalent). o Biases and perspectives to be identified, where present, but not by themselves to be critria for exclusion. • Analytical approach: thematic coding, comparative case analyses, cross-discipliniary comparison (gaps and/or contradictions), synthesis of findings. PLEASE REFER TO THE INVITATION TO TENDER FOR FULL DETAILS. IMPORTANT • Please register your interest by emailing the FRC's procurement team - [email protected] • The FRC will share all tender queries and answers with those that have registered. • Your tender submission must be submitted within the deadline by email to [email protected]

Katy Reed

Published 1 day ago
Open

Centre for Disaster- Audience Strategy & Plan

Our new strategy (2025-2030) sets a bold ambition to increase our influence and enhance our offer to countries. It reflects our drive to respond to national priorities and bring people together around our shared mission. We aim to deliver measurable progress in the disaster finance system, while supporting national and international partners to design and deliver effective, equitable solutions. To achieve this, we need to be more targeted and strategic in how we engage across a global ecosystem of actors. Our audiences range from government ministries, central agencies, and national disaster management authorities, to regional institutions, multilateral organisations, civil society networks, research partners and funders. The audience strategy will give us an organisation-wide framework to help ensure our evidence, policy and engagement and advisory work has maximum influence and uptake; and to support our future funding strategy.  The selected supplier will: • Conduct analysis to identify and prioritise key audiences • Create audience segmentation outputs (functional tiers and archetypes) • Develop messaging and engagement guidance tailored to priority groups • Go beyond strategy slides and provide tools, training and recommendations to embed the strategy into practice across teams Approach & methodology Methodology may include: • Desk research and review of existing strategic documents, partnerships and engagement activities • Interviews or workshops with internal teams • External stakeholder interviews for insight testing • Co-design of outputs with Heads-of-functions to ensure usability and adoption Proposals should detail: • How insight will be gathered and validated • How prioritisation decisions will be reached • How adoption and internal use will be supported Application process Interested suppliers are invited to submit a written proposal outlining their suitability for delivering the services described in this Terms of Reference. Proposals should include: • Outline of a methodology and approach for fulfilling the ToR requirements • A brief overview of the supplier and team, including a CV for each person on the team detailing their experience and qualifications • A description of how the supplier meets each of the experience and evaluation criteria listed above (max. 2 pages). • Examples of previous work relevant to the scope of services • A proposed daily rate and any applicable VAT or additional costs • Outline of proposed budget with time and cost implications. This should be broken down by individual, day rate and number of days required • Contact details for two recent clients who can provide references. Proposals should be submitted by email to [email protected] with the subject line: Proposal Submission: Communications - Audience Strategy & Plan All questions should be emailed to [email protected] by 11:59pm UK time, 5 th December.

AI Bid Assistant

Our AI-powered tool to help you create winning bids is coming soon!

View Contract Source Save Contract

Timeline complete

Publish
Bid
Evaluate
Award
Complete